| CRAIG COMMENTS |
A great advantage of living in Gippsland
East is the range of natural landscapes available within easy reach. From the
finest alpine scenery anywhere in Australia, spectacular river gorges, tranquil
lakes with a wonderful variety of bird life to a coastline where the battle
between land and water is never ending.
It is appropriate that these assets should be protected so that future generations
can also be able to relax and enjoy the gifts that nature has bestowed on this
region. It is hard to imagine why anyone living in East Gippsland, so greatly
favoured by nature, should feel uneasy or discontented.
Nevertheless, it is becoming increasingly
evident that management of our parks, national as well as other types of parks,
is causing increasing disquiet among local people. The problems seem to have
their origins in a complete lack of consideration for local people in the decision-making
processes. Stratford Highway Park has been closed down, the Knob Reserve cannot
meet the demands of the government to contribute towards its upkeep and Rotomah
Island Bird Sanctuary is battling the same problem.
The Annual Report of the National
Parks Advisory Council recommends using municipal rates to raise money for National
Parks. "Historically, municipal rates have covered local open space and
parks", the report states. The Council has come to that view because, it
believes that "the 'Parks Charge' levied under the Water Industry Act 1994
has been generally accepted by the public".
Parks within the metropolitan area
add to the value to surrounding properties and ratepayers should be happy to
contribute. They are subject to intense management and, apart from a few human
pests that they attract, are welcome in any community. Those in the country
are an entirely different proposition and are a liability to the municipality
as well as neighbouring landowners.
The government is currently being sued by a landowner forced off his farm by the ravages of wild dogs breeding up in a forest, protected apparently on the advice of this Council. The government barred the farmer from trying to keep these pests under control. This so-called "Advisory Council", appointed by the Minister is even more out of touch with reality than the Minister is.
Rather than hoping to lead the world
as a "Knowledge Nation", our political parties should learn the lesson
from African nations that National Parks must be a benefit to the people that
live in the vicinity, not a liability. Successive governments have refused to
even contribute to the upkeep of roads used to access its parks. They refuse
to make a contribution to local council revenue on the basis of rate income
forgone because land is tied up "in the national interest".
Unless the local community believes
our national parks are being "preserved for the public benefit" as
defined under the National Parks act and passive utilisation for tourism and
recreation is actually encouraged, local communities will continue to be sceptical
of governments and Parks Victoria's agenda.
page last
edited: 07-Sep-2001