CRAIG COMMENTS
Print

The NSW Government, along with the Victorian and Federal governments, seem to be teetering on the edge of seizing defeat from the jaws of victory with regards to the flows for the Snowy River. 

The three governments still have until 2012 to deliver the majority of their commitments on Snowy environmental flows, but the process has been made considerably harder and more complicated by the litany of failings of the NSW and other shareholding governments. There is no doubt that the NSW Government is still smarting from the failure of their attempt to privatise Snowy Hydro Limited.

Unfortunately for Australian’s who care about the health of our rivers, the main responsibility for management of the Snowy and the implementation of the inter-governmental agreements rests with NSW. But all three governments have a responsibility to ensure that the promises and commitments already made and celebrated by the community are delivered.

The Snowy River Agreement is held as the first major environmental flow agreement reached in Australia. The outcomes only came together after intensive negotiations and community action over five decades and were to be delivered without impact on irrigation security.

When the two state Premiers stood on the bank of the river to celebrate the first water releases, the community looked forward with optimism to the success of the project. However, five years after that historic day, a number of key components of the agreement have still not been implemented and many have been seriously compromised:

 
The Snowy water savings targets have been compromised by the competing Commonwealth and State programs for the Murray River, including the National Water Initiative, the Living Murray, the Riverbank Program, the North South Pipeline and more recently, the National Water Plan. If governments expect to provide effective leadership in meeting our water management challenges, then they need to immediately get all of these programs working together.

If the three governments cannot manage the Snowy outcomes, how can we expect the same governments to fix the Murray using the same basic model? Where there are many more competing vested interests and communities, a multitude of catchments across four states, and 29 major water storages.

I believe that the committed environmental flow targets for the Snowy will eventually be reached, but unless the issues surrounding management of environmental releases and government accountability are addressed the outcomes will be seriously compromised. The governments need to get the Snowy right to regain community confidence in water management -- not just for the Snowy, but for all of our rivers.